Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Maria Haka Flokos's avatar

I couldn't agree more with your words. The argument that people already know what sounds familiar is moot. As you point out, the fact that Van Gogh cut his own ear is probably what most people 'know' and one assumes the programme doesn't cater to a small group of those who are versed in art history.

Which brings us to another issue, the confusion between actual knowledge and mere information. At a time when the latter is at everyone's fingertips, it is worth distinguishing who provides knowledge, in the sense they have already studied the subject, instead of dishing out wiki facts. However, that requires a discerning radio programmer. A tall feat!

Expand full comment
Tabish Khan's avatar

Great piece, and as an art critic, I concur. The tricky element is balancing this with diversity, many people advocating for more diverse representation in our major museums understandably get annoyed by another Andy Warhol, Picasso, Monet, Van Gogh - insert the many other famous Western white men within this category - exhibition. When there are so many other voices not getting shown.

However, I also understand the need to give people what they want and the names above are guaranteed to sell well and bring in the crowds. Which has become more important given cuts to arts funding. It's a tricky balance and galleries and museums often get flak from both sides.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts